ABSTRACT
Objectives: At the beginning of the pandemic, it was believed that severe SARS-CoV2 infection would induce lifelong immunity and that reinfections would be unlikely. However, several cases of reinfection were documented in previously infected patient and the waning humoral immunity has raised significant concerns. Accordingly, long-term and durable vaccineinduce antibody protection against infection have also become a challenge, as several breakthroughs of COVID-19 have been identified in individuals partially or fully vaccinated. This study describes the incidence, the characteristics of severe COVID-19 infections requiring ECMO occurred after vaccination and the presence of side effects related to the vaccine. Method(s): EuroECMO COVID is a prospective, multicenter, observational study, developed by the EuroELSO, based on data from patients aged >=16 years who received ECMO support for refractory COVID-19 during the pandemic in 204 centers. The analysis investigates the survival of vaccinated patient, the associations between management-related variables, the incidence of vaccination during the different pandemic phases, the type of vaccines and the possible side effects. Result(s): Immunosuppressed patients are susceptible to reinfection even after being naturally infected or receiving a full vaccination. Ineffective antibody production, due to relatively ineffective vaccines, inadequate number of doses or the time after vaccination are involved in the pathogenesis of postvaccination infections. This population was found to have a partial immunity due to an inadequate number of doses and an overlapped time from vaccination and SARS-CoV2 incubation with PCR results after being vaccinated. Several manifestations of SARS-CoV2 infection are similar to vaccine-induce side effects and mild symptoms can be presented both as an adverse reaction after vaccination and a result of infection. In this subgroup no side effects were attributable to the vaccine. Conclusion(s): Vaccination does not entirely prevent SARS-CoV2 but will lead to less morbidity and mortality, as demonstrated by less need of ICU and ECMO care. In addition, the partial immunity for inadequate doses of vaccine or through the evolution of new variants demonstrated the importance of further analysis to differentiate the possible causes of waning humoral immunity.
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE There is ongoing dispute whether COVID-19 related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) has unique physiology, setting it apart from 'classic' ARDS. While ECMO has proven valuable in the treatment of acute lung failure, little is known about when and how it should be used to support critically ill COVID-19 patients. METHODS We performed an international email survey to assess how ECMO providers worldwide have previously used ECMO during the treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Questions targeted indications to begin ECMO, technical specifications, anticoagulation strategy and reasons for treatment discontinuation. RESULTS 276 centers worldwide responded that they employed ECMO for very severe COVID-19 cases, mostly in veno-venous configuration (87%). The most common reason to establish ECMO was isolated hypoxemic respiratory failure (50%), followed by a combination of hypoxemia and hypercapnia (39%). Only a small fraction of patients required veno-arterial cannulation due to heart failure (3%). Time on ECMO varied between less than two and more than four weeks. The main reason to discontinue ECMO treatment prior to patient's recovery was lack of clinical improvement (53%), followed by major bleeding, mostly intracranially (13%). Only 4% of respondents reported that triage situations, lack of staff or lack of oxygenators were responsible for the discontinuation of ECMO support. Most ECMO physicians (66% ± 26%) agreed that patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS benefitted from ECMO. Overall mortality of COVID-19 patients on ECMO was estimated to be about 55%, scoring higher than what has previously been reported for Influenza patients on ECMO (29-36%). Most ECMO providers agreed that, while COVID-19 patients were longer on ECMO compared to patients with ARDS of different origin, supposed hypercoagulation was hardly an issue during ECMO therapy and oxygenator change was not required more frequently than they were used to. CONCLUSION ECMO has been utilized successfully during the COVID-19 pandemic to stabilize CARDS patients in hypoxemic or hypercapnic lung failure, despite initial recommendations from scientific societies were mostly reluctant. Age and multimorbidity limited the use of ECMO. Triage situations were rarely a concern. ECMO providers stated that patients with severe COVID-19 benefitted from ECMO. An increasing use in patients with respiratory failure in a future stage of the pandemic may be expected. Early apprehensions that COVID-19 related hypercoagulation would result in severe thromboembolic complications during extracorporeal circulation were mostly mitigated judging from survey experience.
ABSTRACT
Objective: The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) has increased significantly in the last years, and in particular in the recent pandemic COVID-19, representing a valuable therapy to treat severe respiratory failure. However, few patients remain hypoxemic and become hemodynamically instable during V-V ECMO support requiring a change in ECMO configuration. Methods: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry was reviewed for all cases of adult ARDS in patients undergoing ECMO requiring a change in configuration during the support run. (2017 to 2019). All main aspects, if available, characterizing the patients undergoing ECMO support modifications were collected and analyzed in terms of incidence, causes, patterns, complications and outcomes. Results: Of 9936 V-V ECMO runs, there were 354 ECMO that requiring a in changing configurations (3,5%). Over the study period the proportion of ECMO changing configuration was 1,3% (136) for VA, 1,6% (166) for V-VA and 0,8(85%) for Other configurations with an increasing in configuration changing during the years. The mortality rate in the shifting population was 55%. The new configurations were associated with major bleeding, stroke and renal failure was similar. Main determinants of poor outcome were the severity of the underlying illness, the delay in recognizing evolution of the disease, the complications associated with the conversion itself, and the more complex management of the hybrid setting. Conclusions: Our review of ARDS patients showed the variation in configuration VA ECMO or Hybrid ECMO was not associated with worse survival but with a high rates of complications rates compared with VV ECMO. These data suggest that in very selected patients it may reasonable to initially instituted VV ECMO support, reserving VA or Hybrid ECMO forms for conversion for refractory cardiopulmonary failure and cardiogenic shock that represent the major reasons of VV ECMO failure.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: With the occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the year of 2020 the number of patients in need ofintensive care medicine increased dramatically in many countries. Several of them developed an acute respiratory distresssyndrome (ARDS) linked to the COVID-19 infection and many required the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO). Methods: We are retrospectively reviewing 141 patients who underwent ECMO for severe COVID-19-related ARDS in amulticenter study at 10 European ECMO centers. Result: A total of 141 patients (67.4% male, median age was 55.4 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 44-67.5) were treatedwith ECMO for confirmed (132) or suspected (9) severe COVID-19-related ARDS. Before ECMO, the median SequentialOrgan Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 9.0 (IQR: 7.0-11.5), median pH was 7.25 (IQR: 7.20-7.30), and medianPaO /FiO ratio was 70 mm Hg (IQR: 60-77). Venovenous ECMO was provided in 130 patients (92%) and venoarterial ECMO in 11 patients (8%) The median duration ofECMO treatment by now was 11 days, IQR: 7-17). At the time of reporting, 71 confirmed COVID-19 patients (53.8%) arealive, of whom 33 (43.4%) are still in the intensive care unit (9 on ECMO, 24 weaned from ECMO and extubated). Overallmortality so far occurred in 62 patients (46.2%). By now advanced age, low arterial pH, and low platelet count before ECMO were independent risk factors for increasedmortality during the intensive care treatment. Conclusion: Despite a substantial overall mortality of over 40%, approximately half of the patients with severe COVID-19-related ARDS, refractory to conventional treatment, may be successfully managed with ECMO therapy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the outcome of adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Ten tertiary referral university and community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with confirmed severe COVID-19-related ARDS. INTERVENTIONS: Venovenous or venoarterial ECMO. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients (mean age 51.1 ± 9.7 years, female 17.4%) were treated with ECMO for confirmed severe COVID-19-related ARDS. Before ECMO, the mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 10.1 ± 4.4, mean pH was 7.23 ± 0.09, and mean PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio was 77 ± 50 mmHg. Venovenous ECMO was adopted in 122 patients (92.4%) and venoarterial ECMO in ten patients (7.6%) (mean duration, 14.6 ± 11.0 days). Sixty-three (47.7%) patients died on ECMO and 70 (53.0%) during the index hospitalization. Six-month all-cause mortality was 53.0%. Advanced age (per year, hazard ratio [HR] 1.026, 95% CI 1.000-1-052) and low arterial pH (per unit, HR 0.006, 95% CI 0.000-0.083) before ECMO were the only baseline variables associated with increased risk of six-month mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggested that about half of adult patients with severe COVID-19-related ARDS can be managed successfully with ECMO with sustained results at six months. Decreased arterial pH before ECMO was associated significantly with early mortality. Therefore, the authors hypothesized that initiation of ECMO therapy before severe metabolic derangements subset may improve survival rates significantly in these patients. These results should be viewed in the light of a strict patient selection policy and may not be replicated in patients with advanced age or multiple comorbidities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: identifier, NCT04383678.